It’s interesting because this gives numbers and puts it in a certain context with the players lost salaries in mind….

While this is interesting, it’s not really what I think of when I think of the lockout. Yes, some of these guys are gonna make a lot less money. The owners will lose their money.

But, the real losers in this lockout are all of the people who have blue collar jobs in the arenas, in the offices, in the restaurants…etc, etc, etc… Also take into account the fringe NHLers who feel it more and the other guys over in Europe and the other leagues that have their jobs “vacated” because of this lockout. A Millionaires union fighting with Billionaires.

How could you calculate this in the same context of the “NHL Lockout clock”?

These people, the blue collar folks, who work in the restaurants, arenas, front offices, media outlet workers… haven’t made a million or 5 for the last few years. They probably resemble the people who we see everyday, who work for their average (some to lower I’m sure) wage and live pay check to pay check or a little better than that.

These are the people who aren’t able to work steady hours or face layoffs. Who will have a harder time to pay their bills and feed their families.

I just wanted to write these few words. When we talk about feeling the pinch. It’s not the players or the owners. It’s these people, the everyday folks like you and me who are the casualty of this war. There are so many people who feel this much more than either of the parties involved.

I love the sport of hockey. I’ve been a fan of the NHL for a long time. But this lockout is so not necessary.

There is a ton of great hockey out there. And so far, I’m sorry, but I don’t miss you. From Jr A, to Major Junior hockey, to University hockey.

Best of luck to you, the owners and the players. This is not a poke at you. We would all have a hard time dividing this $$ you’re fighting about. So, this isn’t a poke at you…. but this is some of truth about your squabble.

Get it together. And fix your league.

Share and Enjoy

Is it the players?

Is it you, me.. the fans?

Is it the owners?

Is it Gary Bettman??

Here’s a question that is linked to the general statement that is tagged on to the NHL or it’s players from time to time…. Who loves this game?

“For the love of the game”, “We love this game”….etc.

Something that occurred to me while I was watching this lockout unfold, as I’m sure that it occurred to many, was the fact that this is ALL business. (It’s nothing personal dude, it’s just business right?) I also remember thinking about this the last time we (the fans) missed a season of NHL hockey.

The NHL has nothing to do with the love of hockey in a large sense. It does in the sense that you or I love watching hockey, analysing it, thinking or talking about it. Hockey is a great sport.

But the NHL is it’s own entity quite simply. As is the NHLPA. I want to make clear that what I write here is not a knock on either the NHL or the NHLPA.

Both the NHL and the NHLPA are essentially part of a huge 3+ Billion $$$ business. They exist to produce their product and take money from willing clients. Like me. I was quite happy, for instance, to give them some of my hard earned money to purchase NHL Game Center… and some merch. Along with cable channels…etc.

What annoys me a bit is when a catch phrase like “for the love of the game” or anything like that is used in reference to this huge business. People play and work in this league to make $$. And to make quite a bit more $$ than you or I will make. Some make more than many many many of us will ever make in our lifetimes.

And that’s not a reason to be angry with a player. If you or I was offered $4 Million to play hockey. Of course we would take it. It would be foolish not to take that job. As it is also for the owners and their boards to try and profit from us, because as I’ve stated, I willing pay them for the service.

This is a fight about huge $$. It’s not your local construction union or teachers union trying to get a fair shake hoping that by the time they retire they still have a pension. Many have lost both salary and pension funds. This is a fight between people on both sides who make much more money then most of us will never imagine.

So, the NHL and the NHLPA are quite far removed from “the love of the game”. They are a $$ generating entity. That’s enough about that.

There is, however, some really good news if you’re a fan of hockey.

If you’re a fan of hockey and love the game. There are many levels of entertaining hockey to watch. WHL, OHL, QMJHL are 3 great leagues to watch. University hockey is really high calibre, competitive hockey. All these leagues are fast paced and have high skilled talent playing on their rosters.

There is also Junior A, the minor hockey Midget leagues…etc.

Many players playing in these leagues are still playing hockey with a high level of competitive spirit and are much less motivated by the huge pay day they are having…. because even as we see in the NHL (and other pro non hockey leagues), sometimes that huge pay day doesn’t mean it will motivate a player to dedicate himself to the highest degree discipline in order to be the very best he can be.

That isn’t a knock at NHL players either. Honestly, if you or I was offered a job playing hockey in Montreal, you would be a fool to refuse $1 Million.

All this to say that with players signing in Europe already and it looking like we may very well lose a full season again. There is plenty of great hockey that is going to be played. And if you really do love the game, then go support your local minor hockey teams, go support your local major junior teams or junior A or B teams. Go to the local University and see some high calibre, well coached, disciplined hockey.

Many of these leagues may be stronger because of this lockout. And these leagues can benefit from your extra attendance and or volunteerism.

Let the NHL and NHLPA fight it out. In the meantime, go out and enjoy a hockey game.

For the love of the game.

Share and Enjoy

The Boston Bruins won the cup last night which was a disappointment to me as I was really hoping Vancouver would pull through. I should also note that I generally harbor no love for the Bruins…. but seeing as I am a huge fan of NHL hockey, I enjoy the sport. But whatever. Congrats.

All in all though after watching many games in this year’s 2011 edition of the NHL Playoffs, I still have to go back to the opening round and say that for me the best most entertaining series was the Canadiens vs the Bruins. It had intensity, back and forth hockey, goaltending… it had it all. Game 7 overtime…. etc.

Finally, congrats to some of the people in Vancouver for showing us your drunken stupor…. I seriously doubt many of you participated in that riot were actually die hard Canucks / NHL fans…. and more so just fans of the “drunken stupor”…. May you who participated see it for what it really was with sober sight.

Enjoy

Share and Enjoy

The Montreal Canadiens organization does not agree with the decision taken yesterday by the National Hockey League. We can assure you that we have made our position clear to Commissioner Gary Bettman, and that he has agreed to make this issue a priority at the next General Manager’s meeting, which will be held in Florida on March 14-16.

Our organization believes that the players’ safety in hockey has become a major concern, and that this situation has reached a point of urgency. At risk are some of the greatest professional athletes in the world, our fan base and the health of our sport at all levels. Players’ safety in hockey must become the ultimate priority and the situation must be addressed immediately. As a proud father of three hockey players, I want to help create a healthy and safe experience for them, and I certainly never want any family to go through what the Pacioretty’s are experiencing at this moment.

The entire letter can be read here and I certainly encourage you to read it all.
http://canadiens.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=555639

This letter is not written specifically to the Pacioretty incident and mirrors my concerns.

Max came within inches of being permanently paralyzed or even death. Enough is enough.

Even last night, another dangerous hit…. head shot by Kubina on Bolland.

Earlier in the season, another owner came out with strong words for the NHL. That being Mario Lemieux.

To do nothing is to agree that it’s ok to have these dangerous reckless hits.

Reckless hits need to be strongly discouraged.

I applaud you Mr Molson for taking leadership on this issue.

Share and Enjoy

Blame the post not the hit

In a predictable turn of events the NHL came down with a strong position on the dangerous hit that left Max Pacioretty with a severe concussion and a broken C4 vertebrae.

“After a thorough review of the video I can find no basis to impose supplemental discipline. This hit resulted from a play that evolved and then happened very quickly — with both players skating in the same direction and with Chara attempting to angle his opponent into the boards. I could not find any evidence to suggest that, beyond this being a correct call for interference, that Chara targeted the head of his opponent, left his feet or delivered the check in any other manner that could be deemed to be dangerous.

“This was a hockey play that resulted in an injury because of the player colliding with the stanchion and then the ice surface. In reviewing this play, I also took into consideration that Chara has not been involved in a supplemental discipline incident during his 13-year NHL career.” – Mike Murphy, NHL

“The hockey play”. 3 words that can be used to explain anything that happens on the ice. Explaining the play does what? Why not try to eliminate dangerous plays.

There is absolutely no mention if Pacioretty could defend himself in anyway in this hit. League didn’t speak to him. Nothing. NHL Law.

Nothing in terms of any concern that a hit is possibly thrown on a player in vulnerable position.

There seems to be a bit of a difference between “NHL rules” and “society rules” however.

Somehow, in society, if you’re driving your car…. which is something alot of us tend to do from time to time…. if you drive to fast or recklessly… and happen to accidentally drive into a crowd of people or a pedestrian walking…. you’ll likely get charged with dangerous driving, careless driving…. whatever the charge.

But gosh, you didn’t mean to. Why was the pedestrian there?

Well, in society (and I’m sorry if the analogy isn’t 100% in line with NHL punitive system), we try to have people be responsible for their actions… even if they did not mean to “directly” cause harm in some way.

This blog article is not about Chara, I’ve been sickened by the list of serious injuries and the lack of accountability on players in so many cases. There is no clear line…. and seemingly no line or stand by the NHL or NHLPA to take these hits out of the league. Ultimately, it has little to do with a player’s intent. There has to be a strong position by this league and NHLPA to protect the players.

Another concerning part about the NHL’s punitive process… they speak to the aggressor but they don’t even speak with the victim. That is an “investigation”? Brilliant.

Time for change

And so many “experts” are pretty much saying…. “blame the post“. Are you serious? That is not a very intelligent stand. I don’t think you guys could become lawyers with that defense.

Ridiculous

This is a sport and these are life threatening injuries. Enough.

Share and Enjoy

Chara on Pacioretty

This type of thing is altogether unacceptable in the NHL. This, in my opinion, has become more then the elephant in the room for the NHL.

Sidney Crosby, Marc Savard, Bergeron, anyone remember that hit on Booth all that time ago?

I feel like someone should start doing what Don Cherry did some years back when he’d play clips (over and over again) of guys getting nailed into the boards (concussions, broken legs, broken neck) to bring home awareness for the no touch icing rule.

Same thing should happen all these seriously reckless hits.

Needless injuries.

So what’s the next move? Is it ok that many skilled players are taken out by injury?

Pacioretty has suffered a broken C4 vertebrae and a severe concussion.



Please read more on what I think about a players “intention” and NHL punitive system here.

Share and Enjoy

Obviously when we see a hit like we did last night where Pacioretty hit the “turnbuckle” (as some people refer to it) we’ll have a period of shock… and immediately, emotions flare up. That’s normal.

I watch alot of NHL Hockey, not just the Habs, and I have NO appetite in seeing these types of injuries. That’s not to say that I don’t understand that accidents happen and will continue to happen and that is unfortunate, however I believe there are quite a few of these head injuries that can be avoided…. and discouraged (by the NHL and NHLPA) if you will.

So let me clarify what my thoughts are and for the record I do understand that there is a fine line because this is a contact sport. But let’s not let this become an excuse to sit on the fence until someone actually dies as a result of an injury. I believe we should be more intelligent than that.

Accidental injuries

The game of hockey will never be free of injuries. I completely agree with those who say that there is a risk to playing this sport at very competitive levels. It’s a contact sport and there will be completely accidental collisions along the boards, in the corners and at center ice.

We’ve seen all kinds of injuries where a hand may jam in the boards when a player takes a hit and can result in a broken finger, hand, wrist, arm….. these are those types of injuries where the player receiving contact usually has the puck, gets hit and collides in the boards in some unbalanced manor.

That will always happen.

Avoidable, questionable injuries

There are many injuries that I believe can be avoided, such as a bulk of recent head injuries, but these injuries can only be avoided if the players are drawn clearer lines on what constitutes proper contact.

A message should be sent to players so that they are encouraged to lay off a hit when an opposing player is in a vulnerable position. This can be equated to a boxer in the heat of the moment starting to swing a hook or jab when the bell goes off and quickly attempts to pull back. Sometimes it happens… but I’ve seen boxers pull back and not nail their intended target. I marvel at how many boxers and UFC fighters have utmost respect for their opponents, even in the heat of the battle. (Notice I did say “Many”)

Also should be noted that often times a team starts “running” at the other team when a game is out of hand…. and it’s sometimes to the point where it’s predictable.  I felt like there would be some “gooning” last night. And there were other such comments on Twitter. Sometimes, you can easily predict it.

Check out these comments literally a minute before the Pacioretty injury and just after:

@GamePointsRadio “Sadly, I feel like we’re going to see a #Canadiens player get run at in a dirty manner in the third.”
http://twitter.com/GamePointsRadio/status/45305280426283008

And then… @GamePointsRadio “@yves_on_habs and we just saw it”
http://twitter.com/GamePointsRadio/status/45306548116914176

Ultimately, I think that there should be heavy incentive put on players and possibly on the teams whom they play for to layoff hits where their targets are in a vulnerable position. Hockey is a sport about putting a puck in the net.

Proving intent to injure is in some cases like asking someone to prove the existence or non-existence of God. Doesn’t necessarily make sense.

A results based system for dealing with head shots, blind side hits….etc…. seems more intelligent then the current approach.

After all, I’d say 99.9% of high sticking minors and majors are accidental right? There is no intent to put your stick through someone’s teeth. So why not the same kind of clarity on hits.

It would force players to exercise due diligence in hitting practices the very same as they’re already expected to be careful with their sticks around opposing players.

Excuses

“Guys are so big, the game is so fast”, “It happens so fast”….

I understand it’s a fast paced game and guys are big and strong. But let’s flip that thinking around just a little for a sec.

If players know it’s fast paced and people can get hurt as a result, it’s all the more reason why they should take care with their actions on the ice. Like, for example, easing off a guy a bit because you suspect he could be in a vulnerable position.

I don’t mean this topic to be on Chara because it’s not. The example has played itself out with countless examples of Cooke, Richards…etc. The list is getting long.

In Chara’s case. Yes, he’s big and he’s strong. That gives him a certain advantage in certain aspects of the game. But it should also be made clear that those attributes put a certain amount of responsibility on his shoulders for his actions on the ice… just like in society. Making him tall wouldn’t excuse a high stick on a guy like Desharnais does it? I didn’t think so. His height, size, strength or speed would make no difference in that call.

Let’s look at it another way. In modern society, let’s say you get into fights every now and then… .you get bruised up, maybe one night you get an assault charge. Then one night you go out and fight…. and the guy dies as a result of his injuries. It happens. And guess what…. you didn’t intend to kill him. But you get punished.

Because for some reason some aspects of the sports officiating are “results” based, and others we tend to get lost in the jumbled world of intention. No one cares about intention with a high stick.

A person has to be aware of his or her surroundings and potentially dangerous outcomes. We deal with close calls, concentration and split second thinking often enough in busy traffic. It’s about responsibility.

Fighting

For the record, I wanted to write a short comment that I’m not one of the people who would or will rally against banning all fighting in the NHL. If 2 guys want to square off… so be it. It can certainly sway the emotion and momentum of a game.

So…..

Trying to determine intent is more like chasing the wind. There has to be a system where it is “results based” just as it is with high sticking.

Time for players to take more responsibility. Yeah, it’s fast, they’re big. But a soldier understands he’s carrying a loaded weapon and the responsibility that comes with it.

Being reckless has consequences.

Hockey is a sport about putting a puck in the net. Not crippling other hockey players.

Are we gonna do something or nothing? What’s the excuse now?

What are your thoughts? I’d love to read them.

Share and Enjoy